Reimagining Human Rights in the Age of Global Surveillance

Reimaginando los Derechos Humanos en la Era de la Vigilancia Global

Authors

  • Wang Jiawei Renmin University of China
  • Noah Rodriguez Yale University
  • Lara Vitoria Farias Silveira Universidade de São Paulo

Keywords:

Global surveillance, Digital rights, Human rights frameworks, Algorithmic governance, Technological sovereignty

Abstract

This article critically interrogates the future of human rights in a world increasingly dominated by global surveillance regimes. As states and corporations expand their capacity for data extraction, algorithmic control, and biometric monitoring, traditional human rights frameworks—centered on privacy, freedom of expression, and autonomy—struggle to remain adequate and enforceable. Drawing on interdisciplinary research across legal studies, critical surveillance theory, and digital human rights advocacy, this study argues for a redefinition of human rights that accounts for structural digital oppression and transnational power asymmetries. Case studies from China, the United States, and Brazil illustrate how surveillance disproportionately targets marginalized communities, reinforcing existing social and political inequalities. The novelty of this research lies in proposing a rights framework grounded in digital justice, technological sovereignty, and collective protection, moving beyond liberal individualism. This article contributes to ongoing debates on the intersection of technology, human rights, and global governance.

 

Este artículo analiza críticamente el futuro de los derechos humanos en un mundo cada vez más dominado por regímenes de vigilancia global. A medida que los Estados y las corporaciones expanden su capacidad de extracción de datos, control algorítmico y monitoreo biométrico, los marcos tradicionales de derechos humanos—centrados en la privacidad, la libertad de expresión y la autonomía—resultan cada vez más insuficientes y difíciles de hacer valer. Basado en una investigación interdisciplinaria que abarca estudios jurídicos, teoría crítica de la vigilancia y activismo por los derechos digitales, este estudio propone redefinir los derechos humanos para incluir las formas estructurales de opresión digital y las asimetrías de poder transnacionales. Estudios de caso en China, Estados Unidos y Brasil demuestran cómo la vigilancia afecta de forma desproporcionada a comunidades marginadas, reforzando desigualdades sociales y políticas existentes. La novedad de este trabajo radica en la propuesta de un marco de derechos basado en la justicia digital, la soberanía tecnológica y la protección colectiva, superando el enfoque liberal individualista. Este artículo contribuye a los debates actuales sobre tecnología, derechos humanos y gobernanza global.

References

Abelson, H., et al. (2015). Keys Under Doormats: Mandating Molecular Access and its Costs. MIT Press.

Amoore, L. (2013). The politics of possibility: Risk and security in the 21st century. Duke University Press.

Australia Human Rights Commission. (2021). Human Rights and Technology Final Report.

Benjamin, R. (2019). Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Polity.

Binns, R. (2018). "Algorithmic Accountability and Public Law". Public Law, 269.

Brayne, S. (2020). Predict-and-Surveil: Data, Algorithms, and the Future of Policing. Oxford University Press.

Cate, F. H., & Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2013). Notice and consent in a world of Big Data. International Data Privacy Law, 3(2), 67-73.

Citron, D. K., & Pasquale, F. (2014). The scored society: Due process for predictive algorithms. Washington Law Review, 89, 1.

Cohen, J. E. (2012). Configuring the Networked Self. Yale University Press.

Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). "The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy". Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science.

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press.

European Union. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689).

Feldstein, S. (2019). The Global Expansion of AI Surveillance. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Galič, M., Timan, K., & Koops, B. J. (2017). Bentham, Foucault, and beyond: Explaining surveillance through the panopticon. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1), 9-37.

Greenwald, G. (2014). No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State. Metropolitan Books.

Harcourt, B. E. (2015). Exposed: Desire and punishment in the digital age. Harvard University Press.

Ienca, M., & Andorno, R. (2017). Towards New Human Rights in the Age of Neuroscience. Life Sciences, Society and Policy.

International Commission of Jurists (ICJ). (2022). Digital Technologies and Human Rights: A Legal Framework.

Kaye, D. (2019). Speech Police: The Global Struggle to Govern the Internet. Columbia Global Reports.

Kostka, G. (2019). China’s Social Credit Systems and public opinion. New Media & Society, 21(7).

Lyon, D. (2018). The Culture of Surveillance: Watching as a Way of Life. Polity Press.

Macnish, K. (2017). The Ethics of Surveillance: An Introduction. Routledge.

Milanovic, M. (2015). Human rights treaties and foreign surveillance: Privacy in the digital age. Harvard International Law Journal, 56(1), 81-146.

Naqvi, S., & Batool, S. (2023). Regulatory Responses to Data Breaches: Evaluating GDPR and CCPA. Warwick Evans Publishing.

Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press.

OHCHR. (2021). The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age: Report of the UN High Commissioner. A/HRC/48/31.

Qiang, X. (2019). The Road to Digital Unfreedom: President Xi’s Surveillance State. Journal of Democracy, 30(1).

Raji, I. D., et al. (2020). Closing the AI Accountability Gap. Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.

Richards, N. M. (2013). The Dangers of Surveillance. Harvard Law Review, 126(7), 1934-1965.

Roessler, B., & Mokrosinska, D. (2015). Social dimensions of privacy: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge University Press.

Scott-Railton, J., et al. (2022). The Pegasus Project: A Global Menace. Citizen Lab.

Soldatov, A., & Borogan, I. (2015). The Red Web: The Struggle Between Russia's Digital Dictators and the New Online Revolutionaries. PublicAffairs.

Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1-14.

UNESCO. (2015). Privacy, Free Expression and Transparency: Redefining Boundaries.

United Nations General Assembly. (2014). The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age. Resolution A/RES/68/167.

United Nations General Assembly. (2018). The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age. Resolution A/HRC/39/29.

Van Dijk, J. (2012). The network society. SAGE Publications.

Véliz, C. (2020). Privacy Is Power: Why and How You Should Take Back Control of Your Data. Melville House.

Viljoen, S. (2021). A Relational Theory of Data Governance. Yale Law Journal.

Wong, J. S. (2020). Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights in the Digital Age. Oxford Review of Economic Policy.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Jiawei, Wang, Noah Rodriguez, and Lara Vitoria Farias Silveira. 2025. “Reimagining Human Rights in the Age of Global Surveillance: Reimaginando Los Derechos Humanos En La Era De La Vigilancia Global”. Revista De Derechos Humanos Contemporáneos 1 (1):1-42. https://publications.socipol.org/index.php/rdh/article/view/16.

Issue

Section

Articles/Articulos